Home / MONEY NEWS / Was Jonah Hill Ripped off For His Role in Wolf of Wall Street?

Was Jonah Hill Ripped off For His Role in Wolf of Wall Street?

Photo courtesy of hypable.com

Photo courtesy of hypable.com

Jonah Hill has ascended the royalty ladder in Hollywood over the past couple years and moved on from being the funny guy to Academy Award nominated actor. Not once, but twice. First, for his role in Brad Pitt’s Moneyball and just recently for his work in Martin Scorsese’s Wolf of Wall Street. But did he get ripped off?

The 30-year-old actor recently revealed to Howard Stern on Tuesday that he was paid $60 thousand for his role in the film. This is very low by Hollywood standards, especially when you consider that the films leading man, Leonardo DiCaprio earned an estimated $10 million for his work. The news came via a Tweet from Stern’s Sirius XM show.

“@jonahhill tells @howardstern that he did the 7 month ‘Wolf of Wall Street’ shoot for $60,000 because he wanted the role so bad,” read the Tweet.

The actor, however, was fully aware of what he was doing and is completely content with his compensation for the role. Hill stated that he was simply very excited to work with Scorsese and was happy to do it for the money he was offered. The $60 thousand Hill reportedly received is actually the minimum according to the regulations of the Screen Actors Guild (SAG). But success is not only measured by the paycheck. As mentioned, Hill now has the opportunity to win an Oscar for his work on the film and his co-star DiCaprio will be looking to take home his very first one as well.

“I am so honored to be nominated. Thanks to the Academy and congrats to my fellow Wolves @LeoDiCaprio, Mr. Scorsese and Terry on their noms!” Hill said in a Tweet after the Oscar nominations were announced.

About Ryan Scott

  • http://www.sonshi.com Thomas Huynh

    Nobody knows whether he could’ve asked for more. But we all know he only wanted $60k and he got the role.

  • generationpolitics

    Who gives a s***t!

    Lower class income makes only $20k – $30k.

    WOW a rich Hollywood star works for 60k! stop the presses everyone.

  • Salini

    No, he was overpaid. The film is horrible, everyone walked out the day I went. Most demanded a refund. If you enjoy watching hookers anally raped with candles, cocaine sucked out their anuses, and hundreds of men constantly masturbating and raping hookers openly all day long for 3 hours of this movie, then this is the porno flick for you.

    But if you are a decent person with values, morals, decency and respect women and life as sacred, you will probably get sick to your stomach as I did. Porn on Christmas Day? Come on Hollywood. I see the trend to lowering everyone’s sensibilities and consciousness is on the rise. People are being brainwashed to believe this is “art” when it is just trashy pornography.

    I was saddened by the film and especially sad for Leonardo DiCaprio and Martin Scorsese, both of whom I respect and have done fine work. Leo should have been recognized years ago for his many fine performances like, Blood Diamond, The Aviator, Titanic, The Great Gatsby, The Departed and esp his bio on J. Edgar Hoover, clearly his finest performance ever.. This is the worst film of his career. Scorsese’s last film was Hugo, one of the greatest films ever made in Hollywood. To see him sink to this is very tragic and embarrassing. I was embarrassed for everyone involved. If it wins anything, it’s been rigged.

    It’s just a porn flick with A-list actors and no script or acting at all. I’m sure Ron Jeremy could have done a better job.

642-874 74-678 70-243 hp2-z33 070-642 c2090-610 642-997 98-365 adm-201 aws-sysops 070-488 tk0-201 og0-093 300-135 ex0-005 70-347 300-101 icgb 3002 4a0-m01 c_tadm51_731 c_tscm62_66 640-875 mb6-703 pmi-sp icbb 1z0-808 300-320 1z0-052 70-466 itilfnd iia-cia-part3 c4090-971 400-101 cwna-106 1z0-803 9l0-012 70-448 mb2-704 640-722 070-347 412-79 2v0-620 hp2-z34 jn0-360 hp2-z31 070-411 1z0-061 400-051 pr000041 hp0-s42 070-412 hp2-b115 1z0-434 642-999 70-465 cissp 1y0-301 c2180-401 hp2-z12 mb6-704 ns0-157 070-486 300-115 mb5-705 640-864 642-889 70-488 352-001 070-483 cbap 2v0-621d 640-554 pmp 350-018 700-701 hp5-b04d 1z0-060 300-208 101 640-916 n10-006 70-341 9l0-422 700-501 1z0-053 70-480 jn0-660 70-410 070-461 a00-211 iia-cia-part1 70-487 c4040-252 300-206 hp0-s41 hp0-d31 220-802 70-687 98-367 210-260 tb0-123 1y0-201 70-462 ccd-410 200-120 dev-401 1v0-601 010-111 og0-091 070-487 1z0-062 hp0-a116 100-101 sk0-003 70-980 cca-500 2v0-621 70-417 cism 220-801 cisa 646-365 640-692 lx0-103 070-246 70-483 70-486 ex300 102-400 210-060 640-911 642-737 400-201 70-331 1z0-051 hp2-h35 500-260 hp0-y51 mb2-708 e10-001 pmi-rmp 101-400 070-480 70-533 300-070 98-349 cas-002 hp0-j73 c4040-251 pegacsa71v1 n10-005 700-039 sy0-401 70-463 642-980 jn0-102 e20-690 070-410 350-080 mb2-707 700-260 70-467 070-465 e05-001 70-413 312-49v8 98-364 prince2-foundation 1z0-804 1z0-047 vmce_v8 70-414 mb2-701 1z0-067 200-310 70-346 ex200 300-209 mb6-702 810-401 70-685 ns0-101 70-534 700-280 642-998 642-437 70-412 c_tfin52_66 70-532 1z0-133 p2080-099 itil c4040-250 810-403 70-662 1y0-400 ax0-100 300-075 70-461 70-411