Home / AMERICAN NEWS / Is California dividing Into Six States?

Is California dividing Into Six States?

California is the most populated state in the US, currently around 38 million, and as a result it has been said that the state is difficult to govern. But is California dividing into six states? If Tim Draper has his way, the answer is yes.

Above, California divided into six states - photo courtesy of geocurrents.info

Above, California divided into six states – photo courtesy of geocurrents.info

Draper, a venture capitalist from Silicon Valley is pushing a proposal that would divide the heavily populated western state into six different states. Draper claims that the citizens would be better served by six smaller governments.

“Vast parts of our state are poorly served by a representative government,” Draper said.

Though there may be truth in Draper’s statements, it may not matter. There have been plans introduced in the past to divide California, but none have succeeded. Previous plans suggested dividing the state into anywhere from two to four separate states.

Draper has received approval to begin collecting signatures on a petition. If he collects enough, roughly 808,000 of them by mid-July, the proposal will go to ballot.

Even if California voters approve the measure, it would have to be approved by congress. Under the constitution, all state creations or divisions of any states must be approved by congress.

The other issue that would need to be addressed is that currently, California has 2 senators. Under the proposal, 10 more senators would have to be added, 2 for each new state. But Raphael Sonenshein, executive director of the Pat Brown Institute of Public Affairs at California State University, seems to think that isn’t likely.

“I don’t think anyone is going to give California 12 Senate seats,” Sonenshein said.

Is California dividing Into Six States?

About Ryan Scott

  • labman57

    Once again, tea-chugging extremists who are unable to cram their right wing policy proposals down the throats of the more moderate Californian electorate conclude that they no longer want to be part of the state. And so in an act of self-serving faux patriotism, they are attempting to create their own little havens of like-minded racially-intolerant, avaricious, socially-regressive knuckleheads.

    Hmmm. Should this foolhardy, highly improbable attempt at multiple-statehood be approved by all of the powers that be and actually come to pass …

    … shall we count how long it takes for these short-sighted, narrow-minded fools and their newly elected representatives to appeal to the federal government for massive subsidies and other financial support?

  • MendoChuck

    Upward and Onward Through The Fog . . . . .
    Succeed or not California needs some kind of an adjustment. It certainly isn’t doing its best at the moment.

101 > < 70-534 > < cissp > < 70-486 > < 070-347 > < 100-101 > < sscp > < CBAP > < 400-051 > < 400-051 > < 70-533 > < 101 > < 300-320 > < sy0-401 > < 70-697 > < cas-002 > < 300-070 > < 70-410 > < 1V0-605 > < 2v0-621 > < 200-125 > < 200-120 > < 70-346 > ICGB 650-474 642-072 700-601 HD0-200 E20-360 9L0-063 HP0-J17 70-685 650-178 000-539 1V0-601 >> 200-125 >> 070-483 >> C2180-401 >> 070-342 >> 1Z0-470 >> M70-301 >> SY0-401 >> HP0-J73 >> NS0-506 >> CQE >> EX300 >> 700-104 >> 700-270 >> NCLEX-PN >> VCP550 >> NS0-157 >> 74-697 >> ICYB >> ICGB >> 70-496 >> MB2-707 >> 1Z0-517 >> 117-304 >> 1Z0-507 >> MB2-704 >> C9510-317 >> 1Z0-241 >> 070-346 >> 350-080 >> E10-002 >> 70-461 >> 70-385 >> 70-347 >> 1Z0-064 >> OG0-093 >> 070-687 >> 117-303 >> 1Z0-062 >> 820-422 >> E22-283 >> HP2-N46 >> 1Z0-061 >> AHM-520 >> 70-488 >> 1Z0-511 >> 300-101 >> 640-916 >> GPEN >> 400-051 >> 70-411 >> 300-115 >> SSCP >> 070-410 >> 1Y0-351 >> 300-208 >> CRISC >> PEGACSA71V1 >> CISSP-ISSMP >> PMI-SP >> 9L0-521 >> JN0-102 >>