GMO Foods: In the ever-complicated debate over labeling of genetically modified foods, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack says he has an idea: use your smartphone.
Vilsack told members of Congress that consumers could just use their phones to scan special bar codes or other symbols on food packages in the grocery store. All kinds of information could pop up, such as whether the food’s ingredients include genetically modified organisms, or GMOs.
“Industry could solve that issue in a heartbeat,” Vilsack said.
Just use the Fooducate app to scan bar codes . . .
• Find out what is GMO or is Non-GMO in seconds.
• Find out if something is vegan, vegetarian and organic – instantly.
• Filter for wheat, gluten, food colorings and food allergens.
• Get a quick calorie count and fat content (the good and bad fats).
Government won’t label it? Worse than Bush: Obama fills key government positions in agriculture and trade with biotech execs Take action, get the FREE smart phone food app. Don’t waste time wondering what you’re eating ever again, just scan the bar code, read a short description, look at the ratings, etc.
“The best part of the Fooducate app is that it gives concise explanations along with a grading system developed by scientists, dietitians and concerned parents. I believe that if everyone started scanning bar codes with the Fooducate app and used the GMO/non-GMO indicator, there could be a wave of millions of people who avoid GMO entirely in the near future, and maybe, just maybe, we could put an end to GMO altogether” (http://www.fooducate.com/).
The Food and Drug Administration handles most food-package labeling, so Vilsack’s idea isn’t an official proposal. But the agriculture secretary suggested it could head off the debate between the food industry and those who have pushed for package labels that identify GMOs.
At least one labeling advocate disagreed. Scott Faber, head of the national Just Label It campaign, says most consumers don’t have the know-how to use their phones to scan a bar code or so-called QR code, a commonly used scannable image.
“Consumers shouldn’t have to have a high-tech smartphone and a 10-gigabyte data plan to know what’s in their food,” Faber said.
An FDA spokeswoman said the idea is “not currently under discussion” at that agency.
Vilsack has mentioned the idea before, but he said it could have new life as Congress becomes more involved in the issue. A Republican House bill would block any further state efforts to require GMO package labels. Last year Vermont became the first state to pass a law to requiring the labeling.
Vilsack said some food companies have been receptive to his idea, though he didn’t name any.
There’s some indication that food companies are mulling similar ideas. A spokesman for the Grocery Manufacturers Association, which represents the food industry, said the group is “actively discussing ways to further provide consumers with this important information.” Jeff Beckman, a spokesman for The Hershey Co., said the company is working on new ways it can make ingredient and nutrition information “more readily accessible through new technologies.”
Consumer advocates pushing for the labeling say shoppers have a right to know what is in their food, arguing that not enough is known about the effects of the technology. They have supported several state efforts to require labeling, with the eventual goal of having a federal standard. The food industry has vigorously opposed the effort, saying labels would be misleading because GMOs are safe.
Vilsack has been supportive of genetically modified crops, saying at the hearing that there is “no question in my mind” that they are safe. But he has called for the two sides to try to come together.
“A bar code seems the best way of doing it without picking sides,” he said.