Yes America we’re in a mini revolution as we type out our cryptic, ranting messages of disappointment $ injustice across the airways while comfortably perched behind our computers in our pajamas. It would seem we have a better hold on how we communicate today than ever, but we don’t.
No one who needs to hear our free speech pays attention; those who do hear us pass the message on to someone else, perhaps someone of great leadership that ignores it. In fact it’s easier than ever in any lifetime for important information to be ignored, because the lame stream media will make sure the public has no clue to the truth around them.
If I didn’t know better I’d assume the government came up with Twitter for just this purpose. Keep us otherwise detained while they continue to break laws.
“Give the public lemmings some way to rant $ rave about the issues that are destroying their lives; just keep them out of our hair.” This is what I’d imagine Eric Holder would say with the opportunity? Obama would agree with him.
The truth is Twitter is a great way to communicate in spite of the, “behind closed doors of secrecy” bit. If the government did come up with Twitter just to appease, shut us up and ignore outrageous crimes being committed against us, we’ve found it most useful and helpful anyway.
But how sad that the most horrendous problems of life are not handled in person $ by who they should be anymore? The many professionals, experts $ leaders do their work today over e-mail, Facebook and Twitter, while our leaders are corrupt.
Yes, I said corrupt! In fact they are hardened criminals $ I don’t say this lightly. I’ve had personal experience with every politician in office today that addresses serious issues in my jurisdiction…some outside of it. They ignore my requests with form letters from behind closed doors of secrecy, by e-mail $ have for eleven years. They most all have Twitter accounts $ encourage the to public twitter them.
Apparently so they can ignore their constituents some more.
These political leaders whom are paid by our taxes to protect us, can easily say, “Sorry your e-mail went into spam or I didn’t receive your twit. Because I didn’t get the message the victim died? Oh well you win some, (of my choosing) $ lose the rest because I don’t give a rats ass $ no one’s making sure I do, because no one’s above me, I’m US Attorney General Holder. And, I don’t accept phone calls.”
Meanwhile no one’s asking these leaders to prove that they didn’t receive our frantic request for an investigation into something as silly as an eighty million dollar embezzlement from a consumer’s trust account, by the financial institution that held the trust?
Well Twitter, Facebook $ other social media can be the avenue to asking, but the nature of the outlet is secrecy in who you’re talking to or who’s listening?
This is the American public’s free speech today. And, we wonder why some consumers eventually go nuts and commit some horrendous crime against their fellow man?
Obama has already made it against the law to protest at a political gathering?
I can most defiantly blame the public’s furry on our government leaders, as they continue to destroy the consumer any way they can $ believe me there isn’t a method not available to them or exercised today.
Closed doors of secrecy protect them, while the public uses the last method they have left to fight back, social media. But, it’s merely a ranting machine taking over for the media in most cases, giving an outlet to the social butterflies and lonely in others.
Personally I believe the social media to be invaluable today no matter why it got started. The public has overcome and at some point the lame stream media will be out of business.
Should we be concerned that the government will take our social media outlets away too? A one and only outlet with the truth?
Never the less social media is full of election discussions $ what candidate will best represent our country and their state.
Unfortunately from my perspective and experience there is no candidate that will help anything unless the financial institutions are stopped from committing federal crimes against the consumer.
Does anyone wonder why these candidates, no matter what party they belong to, refuse to discuss the criminal activities of the financial institutions?
We should be asking why in person? Look into the eyes of this leader $ see the truth before he/she answers.
Believe me the answer should start a big revolution.
